Supreme Court Takes a Stand Against Religious Patriarchy by Amisha Arora

The Supreme Court's Decision on the Sabarimala Case

On September 28, 2018, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India ruled that women of all ages are allowed to enter the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala. The decision was a landmark victory for women's rights in India, and it has been met with mixed reactions.

Timeline

The Sabarimala Temple is a Hindu temple dedicated to Lord Ayyappan, a celibate deity. For centuries, the temple has prohibited women of menstruating age from entering. This practice was based on the belief that menstruating women are impure and that their presence would pollute the temple.

In 2006, a group of women filed a petition in the Kerala High Court challenging the ban on women's entry to the temple. The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the ban.

The women then appealed to the Supreme Court. In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the women, striking down the ban on women's entry to the temple.

Why is this important?

The Supreme Court's decision is a landmark victory for women's rights in India. It is a recognition that women have the same right to worship as men, regardless of their age or menstrual status. The decision is also a blow to religious patriarchy and discrimination against women.

What brought this on?

The ban on women's entry to the Sabarimala Temple was based on the belief that menstruating women are impure and that their presence would pollute the temple. This belief is rooted in patriarchal notions of women's bodies and their role in society.

The Supreme Court's decision to strike down the ban is a rejection of these patriarchal notions. It is a recognition that women are not impure and that their presence does not pollute temples. The decision is a step towards a more just and equitable society for women.

Why is it necessary?

The Supreme Court's decision is necessary to ensure that women have equal access to religious places. It is also necessary to challenge religious patriarchy and discrimination against women. The decision is a step towards a more just and equitable society for women. 

The Supreme Court's decision on the Sabarimala case is a momentous occasion that has the potential to change the lives of millions of women in India. The decision has been met with mixed reactions, with some people celebrating the victory for women's rights and others expressing anger and dismay.

The decision is a victory for women who have long fought for the right to enter the Sabarimala Temple. The temple is a major pilgrimage site for Hindus, and the ban on women's entry had been a source of discrimination and injustice. The decision is a step towards a more just and equitable society for women in India.

However, the decision has also been met with anger and dismay by some people. Some people believe that the temple is a sacred space that should be protected from the pollution of menstruating women. Others believe that the decision is an attack on Hindu culture and tradition.

The Supreme Court's decision is a complex and controversial issue. It is an issue that has the potential to divide India along religious and gender lines. However, it is also an issue that has the potential to unite India in a common fight for justice and equality.

My opinion on it

I believe that the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the ban on women's entry to the Sabarimala Temple is a landmark victory for women's rights in India. It is a recognition that women have the same right to worship as men, regardless of their age or menstrual status. The decision is also a blow to religious patriarchy and discrimination against women.

I am proud of the Supreme Court for making this decision, and I hope that it will inspire other countries to follow suit. Women deserve to be treated equally in all aspects of life, including religion. This decision is a step in the right direction.My opinion on it

I believe that the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the ban on women's entry to the Sabarimala Temple is a landmark victory for women's rights in India. It is a recognition that women have the same right to worship as men, regardless of their age or menstrual status. The decision is also a blow to religious patriarchy and discrimination against women.

I am proud of the Supreme Court for making this decision, and I hope that it will inspire other countries to follow suit. Women deserve to be treated equally in all aspects of life, including religion. This decision is a step in the right direction

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sedition law and it's validity by Amisha Arora

Image
Supreme Court to hear plea challenging constitutional validity of sedition law The Supreme Court is set to hear a plea challenging the constitutional validity of the sedition law. The plea has been filed by a group of lawyers, who argue that the law is vague and can be used to suppress dissent. The hearing is scheduled for May 23, 2023. The sedition law was enacted in 1860 during the British colonial rule. It was used to suppress any form of opposition to the British government. After independence, the law was retained by the Indian government. However, there have been growing calls to repeal the law in recent years. The petitioners in the case argue that the sedition law is vague and can be used to suppress dissent. They point out that the law does not define what constitutes sedition. As a result, it can be used to target anyone who criticizes the government or its policies. The petitioners also argue that the sedition law is a violation of the right to freedom of speech ...
Read more